Before it’s obvious
Most investors still aren’t looking at houses this way.
Airbnb sounded weird. Ride sharing sounded weird. New models usually do, right up until they don’t.
Renting your spare room to a stranger sounded like a bad idea. So did getting in a car with a driver you’d never met. Both took years, both got fought over the whole way, and both ended up changing how people actually live.
CoLiving might be on that same track. Might be. I’m not going to pretend I know, and plenty of housing ideas never got past interesting.
What I can tell you is that people who study markets for a living have started counting this one. Grand View Research projects the global co-living market growing about 13.5% a year through 2030; Market.us projects about 15.4% a year through 2034.
Before you get too excited, look at what they’re actually counting. That’s big professionally run co-living buildings, a lot of them overseas. It is not a five-bedroom house rented by the room, and it tells you nothing about whether your deal works. All it tells you is that real money has started paying attention.
Here’s the part that matters. Both of those models spent years arguing with city councils, and this one will too. Which is why the first question on any house is what your city allows, not what the rooms rent for.
Sources: Grand View Research, Co-living Market Size, Share & Trends Report, 2025–2030; Market.us, Co-living Market, 2025–2034. Both are paid industry reports, and neither firm shows its work.